A Deo et Rege

In the aftermath of the recent Church shooting, one person estimates that the security guard who shot and killed the gunman probably “saved over 100 lives.” That’s right, guns don’t just cause crime, but actually stop it. Most sane people recognize this fact and affirm the need for military, police, and private security to be armed. However, many of the same people still support keeping guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens who want to protect themselves, their families, and total strangers. In fact, if Kansas had denied its citizens their second amendment rights, over 100 people could well have been dead since this “security guard” was actually acting as a volunteer with a Concealed Carry License.

This is consistent with the overall research of John Lott, whose great book “More Guns, Less Crime” has demonstrated the role of guns and specifically concealed carry licenses in reducing crime overall. That book, and his other, “The Bias Against Guns” helped in my journey from a gun controller who bought every myth and half truth put forth by the interest groups via the media to a defender of our second amendment rights.

The mall where the horrendous shooting occurred was, not surprisingly, a gun free zone. And yet, as lots of anti-gun Americans are consistently finding out, a gun free zone just means the good guys (and gals) can’t carry their legally purchased guns that they are trained and licensed to carry. The criminals don’t obey laws, so we have tragedies like this Omaha shooting where the carnage continues until the cops arrive or some unarmed hero risks his life trying to stop an armed man. My family won’t be shopping at “gun free zones” this Christmas. Why? We know those little signs may placate the more squeamish among society, but they definitely do not make us safer. More on this later.

Never feel unsafe again…create your own gun free zone!

I came across an op-ed piece from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette entitled Disarm America? Here’s How. Here are a few of the excerpts:

Now, how would one disarm the American population? First of all, federal or state laws would need to make it a crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The population would then be given three months to turn in their guns, without penalty.

Hunters would be able to deposit their hunting weapons in a centrally located arsenal, heavily guarded, from which they would be able to withdraw them each hunting season upon presentation of a valid hunting license. The weapons would be required to be redeposited at the end of the season on pain of arrest. When hunters submitted their request for their weapons, federal, state and local checks would be made to establish that they had not been convicted of a violent crime since the last time they withdrew their weapons…

And

All antique or interesting nonhunting weapons would be required to be delivered to a local or regional museum, also to be under strict 24-hour-a-day guard. There they would be on display, if the owner desired, as part of an interesting exhibit of antique American weapons, as family heirlooms from proud wars past or as part of collections.

And the most chilling:

The disarmament process would begin after the initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of police would be formed and trained to carry out the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no advance warning, city blocks and stretches of suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and searches carried out in every business, dwelling and empty building. Thoroughness would be at the level of the sort of search that is carried out in Crime Scene Investigations. All firearms would be seized…

Clearly, since such sweeps could not take place all across a city, county, state or the country at the same time, guns would move. But fairly quickly there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas where there should be no firearms. If there were, those carrying them would be subject to quick confiscation and prosecution. On the streets it would be a question of stopping and searching anyone, even Grandma with her walker, with the same penalties for “carrying.”

This author openly states what many proponents of gun control really want: a total ban on weapons, prosecution of law abiding citizens, and a police state to achieve their tactics. Not only does this guy ignore the second amendment in his argument completely, but seems willing to ignore other parts of the constitution to achieve his goals. And, there’s one thing I can promise, even if such a measure were passed: criminals would still commit crimes with and without guns.