Anglicans and Catholics on the Virgin Mary
Christianity, General June 1st, 2005The Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission recently released a joint
document called Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ. I think such a document represents a positive step forward in Anglican and Catholic relations. Although the document is not binding on either side, it does represent a viable framework for future negotiations. Here is the part detailing shared agreement:
As a result of our study, the Commission offers the following
agreements, which we believe significantly advance our consensus regarding Mary. We affirm
together
- the teaching that God has taken the Blessed Virgin Mary in the fullness of her person into his glory as consonant with Scripture, and only to be understood in the light of Scripture (paragraph 58);
- that in view of her vocation to be the mother of the Holy One, Christ’s redeeming work reached ‘back’ in Mary to the depths of her being and to her earliest beginnings (paragraph 59);
- that the teaching about Mary in the two definitions of the Assumption and the Immaculate Conception, understood within the biblical pattern of the economy of hope and grace, can be said to be consonant with the teaching of the Scriptures and the ancient common traditions (paragraph 60);
- that this agreement, when accepted by our two Communions, would place the questions about authority which arise from the two definitions of 1854 and 1950 in a new ecumenical context (paragraphs 61-63);
- that Mary has a continuing ministry which serves the ministry of Christ, our unique mediator, that Mary and the saints pray for the whole Church and that the practice of asking Mary and the saints to pray for us is not communion-dividing (paragraphs 64-75).
79. We agree that doctrines and devotions which are contrary to
Scripture cannot be said to be revealed by God nor to be the teaching of the Church. We
agree that doctrine and devotion which focuses on Mary, including claims to ‘private
revelations’, must be moderated by carefully expressed norms which ensure the unique and
central place of Jesus Christ in the life of the Church, and that Christ alone, together
with the Father and the Holy Spirit, is to be worshipped in the Church.
80. Our statement has sought not to clear away all possible problems,
but to deepen our common understanding to the point where remaining diversities of
devotional practice may be received as the varied work of the Spirit amongst all the
people of God. We believe that the agreement we have here outlined is itself the product
of a re-reception by Anglicans and Roman Catholics of doctrine about Mary and that it
points to the possibility of further reconciliation, in which issues concerning doctrine
and devotion to Mary need no longer be seen as communion-dividing, or an obstacle in a new
stage of our growth into visible koinonia. This agreed statement is now offered
to our respective authorities. It may also in itself prove a valuable study of the
teaching of the Scriptures and the ancient common traditions about the Blessed Virgin
Mary, the Mother of God incarnate. Our hope is that, as we share in the one Spirit by
which Mary was prepared and sanctified for her unique vocation, we may together
participate with her and all the saints in the unending praise of God.
There are some incredible statements here, especially from an Anglican perspective. Some Anglicans would probably argue that it represents a betrayal of Anglicanism’s Reformation roots. Other Anglicans would probably say "about time." Any comments?
The whole document can be found here
Hat Tip: Kendall Harmon
Photo by Jonathan Bennett (from the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception)
June 1st, 2005 at 2:54 pm
I think there are many Anglicans who have a positive view of the Catholic church, and I think they are in fqvour of closer relations. Unfortunately, the Anglican church appears to be badly divided at the moment, and that doesn’t further the goal of unity, but I believe there are Anglican communions that will enter into closer and closer communion with the Catholic church.
June 2nd, 2005 at 9:04 pm
boo on anglicanism’s reformation roots.
actually, i think the point that the anglican church is deeply divided is an important (and troubling) one. Not only are we divided conservative and liberal, we conservatives are divided among ourselves. Some of the conservative groups are more charismatic, low church, okay with ordaining women. I doubt they’d be keen on the mary thing, but I don’t actually know. It’s complicated.
June 3rd, 2005 at 2:12 pm
As you know, I’m all for Mary. However, I’m still Evangelical enough to wish for stronger biblical roots on the Marian doctrines. I’m even ok with the Assumption; it’s the Immaculate Conception I have a problem with. I know that it arises from a concern about purity but I fear that it goes a long step towards undercutting the humanity of Jesus.
Furthermore, more attention needs to be paid to the line between veneration and worship. Worship is due *only* to the Trinity, veneration for those things that point and lead to the Trinity , vis. saints, cross…BVM. I’ve seen a number of Roman practices that seem to cross the line on this one. I’d be happy to be convinced otherwise, but noone seems terribly interested in sketching that line…
The *other* point is that while the document is grand, it’s a moot point. For Anglicans to be received into the RCC, they have to accept the teachings of the Magisterium which means all the debate in the world on this topic doesn’t count–these two dogmas get back-doored in through the papal issue.
June 4th, 2005 at 9:24 am
Anastasia and Les: I think you both make important points about the divisions. Also, I think that looking at Anglican polity, every national body would have to officially adopt this document at its synod for it to represent Anglicanism as a whole. A good example of the division is in a new agreement with the Methodists regarding the Eucharist. I don’t see how the Anglicans can be in eucharistic agreement with the Methodists, the Lutherans, and the Catholics all at the same time. My guess is different elements in the communion (e.g. evangelicals, high church, etc) are pushing these different agreements without really consulting the others.
Derek: You bring up some important points too. As to the Marian and other devotional practices, there are certainly ones that cross the line and make most Catholics (even conservative ones) cringe. The hierarchy has cracked down on some of this, but when it comes to devotion, the hierarchy is often ignored in favor of local custom even if it contradicts church teaching. Fortunately these at least stay in the realm of private devotion and not dogma. You bring up the papacy too, which is the biggest unresolved issue. I think for any progress to be made on any issue, this one will have to be discussed first. However, the Eastern Catholic example shows that within the Magisterium there is some flexibility (e.g. the creed they recite does not use the filioque)
June 7th, 2005 at 8:54 am
Funny, Jonathan, the Eucharistic agreement was one of my big problems with the Lutheran Church–they had agreements with both the Reformed and the Episcopals. Sure enough, it was the high side with one and the low side with the other. Unlike the Episcopal Church, though, unity in Lutheranism is theologically defined. It was, as they say, another brick in the wall…